Reason for request
Indication extension
Key points
Favourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma only.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib in the other situations covered by the MA indication.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is substantial in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, only in clear-cell RCC or with a clear-cell component;
|
| Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is insufficient to justify public funding in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma with a histological type other than clear-cell given the absence of robust data.
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- evidence of the superiority of the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination compared to sunitinib, considered to be an acceptable comparator at the time of implementation of the KEYNOTE-581 (CLEAR) study, for:
- progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee (primary efficacy endpoint): 23.9 months versus median of 9.2 months; HR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.32; 0.49]; p<0.0001,
- overall survival (ranked secondary endpoint): the median was not reached in either of the two groups; HR=0.66; 95% CI [0.49; 0.88]; p=0.0049,
despite:
- an additional toxicity of this combination compared to sunitinib, particularly in terms of serious adverse events (50.6% vs 33.2%), grade ≥ 3 events (82.4% vs 71.8%) or events leading to discontinuation of treatment (37.4% vs 14.4%),
- exploratory quality of life data,
the Transparency Committee considers that the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination, like the pembrolizumab/axitinib combination and the nivolumab/cabozantinib combination, provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma or with a clear-cell component.
|
| Not applicable |
|
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
5y7VfmkcbB3jaGtD